decidedPR #9 (docs: make default-branch health an agent responsibility) was authored by nuuritas and merged at 2026-11-14T01:49:26Z, before this candidate was assessed. The review rule covers open pull requests; there is nothi…link
receiveddocs: make default-branch health an agent responsibility Adds a **Default-branch health** section: check CI after merge, treat conflicts as defects, turn a failing or drifting default branch into an issue, and report it…link
resultblocked: Review of PR #5 is posted as a non-author CHANGES_REQUESTED review (https://github.com/nuuritas/spl-hazirlik/pull/5#pullrequestreview-5900535485); five of its ten checked lines were not met. Follow-up PR #8 (ht…link
openedMeet the review on PR #5: docs: describe the agent structurelink
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
resultready: Audit complete. Inspected 1 pull request updated in the last 24 hours: #5 "docs: describe the agent structure" (author @nuuritas, merged 2026-11-14T01:08:28Z, 0 reviews, no review decision). It fails the review g…link
decidedIssue #6 is a concrete audit request: enumerate the last 24 hours of pull requests, judge each review, open one tracking issue per unreviewed pull request, merge nothing, and end with the counts.link
openedAudit the last 24 hours of pull requests for missing reviewslink
received[auto] audit the last 24 hours of pull requests for missing reviews ## Goal Every pull request touched in the last 24 hours must be either **approved by an account other than its author**, or have its change requests ad…link
receiveddocs: describe the agent structure Adds one section to `AGENTS.md`: the four roles (maintainer, implementer, reviewer, interactive thread), the issue → pull request → checklist → merge loop, the guardrails, and where th…link
decidedEvery master push fails the same Cloudflare Pages build, whose only error record is behind the Cloudflare dashboard. The commit does not touch frontend/, and the repository names no Pages build configuration, so no conc…link
receivedCI failed 1/1 on master at 14fadce: Cloudflare Pages Read github/commits/14fadce8e5a719bc67fb188960deb9f9c94c11f3/checks for every check.link
decidedCI passed with zero checks on master commit 14fadce, so there is no failure for any enabled rule to act on.link
receivedCI passed 0/0 on master at 14fadce Read github/commits/14fadce8e5a719bc67fb188960deb9f9c94c11f3/checks for every check.link
decidedThe Cloudflare Pages check fails again on a commit that only edits plans/superagent JSON. The only failure evidence is a Cloudflare dashboard link, whose log needs credentials this deployment lacks, so no concrete build…link
receivedCI failed 1/1 on master at 059deda: Cloudflare Pages Read github/commits/059deda5da3d380b19bf363588860123a58d73b9/checks for every check.link
decidedCI passed and there are zero checks on master commit 0977388, so there is no failure for any enabled rule to act on.link
receivedCI passed 0/0 on master at 0977388 Read github/commits/097738818fc6ba2e39200474dad1f32a39d12b04/checks for every check.link
decidedThe failing check's log lives in the Cloudflare Pages dashboard, which needs credentials this deployment lacks, so the concrete error cannot be read and no code fix can be established. This is a deployment check on a co…link
receivedCI failed 1/1 on master at 0309161: Cloudflare Pages Read github/commits/030916140dee369b88de71ca033b3c857ea46e47/checks for every check.link
resultready: Merged PR #4 (merge commit f5dd83554242aff9abc34cc9e310c4edefb65a9a); issue #3 closed and the thread carries the outcome. The Android test runner now renders a sixth "Bilmiyorum" row under the options, records it…link
receivedCI failed 1/1 on PR #4 at 7af4605: Cloudflare Pages Read github/pulls/4/checks for every check.link
openedAndroid test runner: add a "Bilmiyorum" (I don't know) answerlink
received@nuuritas-agent please implement this issue as specified.link
received@nuuritas-agent please implement this issue.link
received[auto] Android test runner: add a "Bilmiyorum" (I don't know) answer. Android test runner: add a "Bilmiyorum" (I don't know) answer. ## Goal The Android test runner shows five options (A-E) with no way to say "I don't k…link
resultready: Read-only repository inspection; nothing changed (git status clean) and no PR opened. Deliverable — one sentence: X Bookmark Vault is a small, single-user Cloudflare Workers app backed by one SQLite Durable Objec…link
openedDescribe what the repository contains in one sentence (read-only)link
receivedsuperagent test 2 @nuuritas-agent In one sentence, describe what this repository contains. Do not change any files and do not open a pull request.link
received@nuuritas-agent Reply here with one short sentence confirming you can read this issue. Do not change any files and do not open a pull request.link
received@nuuritas-agent Reply here with one short sentence confirming you can read this issue. Do not change any files and do not open a pull request.link
receivedsuperagent smoke test @nuuritas-agent Reply here with one short sentence confirming you can read this issue. Do not change any files and do not open a pull request. Then stop.link
resultready: Merged PR #148 (squash, b0fcfd1b0153cc4bf261d574a48bce5b3c954847) into main; issue #136 closed. It fixes the one unmet review item from PR #108: the doc comment above ANDROID_APP_URL in src/render.ts now names Sh…link
resultdropped: PR #114 is closed (01:51:23Z), superseded and not merged; head branch docs/merge-needs-review is deleted. My earlier APPROVED review on head f3e1f65 remains the only review on it. I verified the author's resolu…link
decidedPR #146 is already merged (01:49:15Z, head 9967b7b), so the review rule's state check says post no acknowledgement and no review. Nothing asks for a branch-health check or audit, so no ticket is created.link
receivedSuperseded, not rebased. `main` already carries this rule, so folding the branch into it would only duplicate it and delete newer sections. What the review asked for, and where it lives now: - Head-commit review, a new…link
resultready: Delivered: the retrospective review of merged PR #110 is now recorded on the PR — APPROVED by `nuuritas-agent` at head commit `9e85546` (merged as `19e41e8`), https://github.com/nuuritas/shelf/pull/110#pullreques…link
resultprogress: Opened PR #147 (https://github.com/nuuritas/shelf/pull/147) on agent/meet-review-pr-111-09671abec6c3. It adds the nested note-card selectors the #111 review named to the overlay raise rule, bumps the style que…link
receiveddocs: make default-branch health an agent responsibility Adds a **Default-branch health** section: check CI after merge, treat conflicts as defects, turn a failing or drifting default branch into an issue, and report it…link
resultready: Met #140's three review items on merged PR #112. Delivered: a retrospective APPROVED review as nuuritas-agent against head d165b62 — https://github.com/nuuritas/shelf/pull/112#pullrequestreview-5900564018 (review…link
resultready: Retrospective review complete on merged PR #113. I reviewed the merged change at PR head f427bda (squash a04f489; tree-identical, `git diff f427bda a04f489` empty) and posted one APPROVED review: https://github.c…link
resultprogress: Opened PR #145 (docs(agents): require a review before a T3 merge) against main from agent/meet-review-pr-114-4a8d20df6e07, superseding the conflicted PR #114. Branch is based on main 264055c; AGENTS.md rewritt…link
resultprogress: Review of merged PR #115 found two contradictions in its Agent structure section: the guardrails still ask a narrowing question for oversized work (contradicting the split rule added in #99 and the same file's…link
openedMeet the review on PR #78: Refresh the README and package description for the current applink
openedMeet the review on PR #84: Filter the library by source: X, LinkedIn, YouTubelink
openedMeet the review on PR #85: Add runtime server setup to the Android applink
openedMeet the review on PR #86: Add the native iOS app with self-hosted and cloud modeslink
openedMeet the review on PR #87: Save any public web page, not just X, LinkedIn and YouTubelink
openedMeet the review on PR #88: Agent notes, slice 1: note model, /api/posts, shelf add, markdown cardslink
openedMeet the review on PR #89: Agent notes, slice 2: sandboxed HTML, reading page, authoring guide, MCP create_postlink
openedMeet the review on PR #90: Add create_post to the Shelf MCP serverlink
openedMeet the review on PR #92: Move legacy custom domains to the canonical hostlink
openedMeet the review on PR #93: Retire the legacy bookmark host namelink
openedMeet the review on PR #94: Point the agent docs at the renamed shelf instancelink
openedMeet the review on PR #96: Open the library on all saves again, with folders as an optionlink
openedMeet the review on PR #98: Fetch YouTube transcripts with a local yt-dlp wrapperlink
openedMeet the review on PR #99: Tell the agent to split work instead of askinglink
openedMeet the review on PR #100: Fix note rendering: ship note styles in /style.csslink
openedMeet the review on PR #102: Fix shelf add --help exit code and --version outputlink
openedMeet the review on PR #103: Give the note preview link a little airlink
openedMeet the review on PR #104: Record T3 Code as the main harness beside the superagentlink
openedMeet the review on PR #106: refactor: move the native apps to shelf-cloudlink
openedMeet the review on PR #108: fix: link the Android download under its new namelink
openedMeet the review on PR #109: build: deploy with the cf CLI instead of Wranglerlink
openedMeet the review on PR #110: Retire the push log issue and its workflowlink
openedMeet the review on PR #111: Redesign agent note cards and the note reading pagelink
openedMeet the review on PR #112: Let agents update a note by its reflink
openedMeet the review on PR #113: fix: keep note card body and abstract above the card overlaylink
openedMeet the review on PR #114: Require a review before a T3 thread mergeslink
openedMeet the review on PR #115: docs: describe the agent structurelink
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
resultready: 24-hour PR review audit complete; no code change and no PR (the deliverable is issues). Window: PRs updated since 2026-11-13T01:09:17Z (29 PRs). 2 were satisfactorily reviewed (#105, #107, both approved by nuurit…link
decidedThe issue explicitly asks to audit the pull requests of the last day, which the audit rule covers: inspect the PRs, open one tracking issue per PR without a satisfactory review, merge nothing, and report counts.link
openedAudit the last 24 hours of pull requests for missing reviewslink
decidedPR #115 is already merged (01:08:07Z, head 8d63084), so the review rule's state check says post no acknowledgement and no review. No issue asks for a pull-request audit, so nothing remains and no ticket is created.link
received[auto] audit the last 24 hours of pull requests for missing reviews ## Goal Every pull request touched in the last 24 hours must be either **approved by an account other than its author**, or have its change requests ad…link
decidedAn open, non-draft PR in this repository by another author, editing the agent contract. The review rule applies: one review with file:line evidence, approve or request changes, never merge or push.link
openedReview PR #114: require a review before a T3 thread mergeslink
receiveddocs: describe the agent structure Adds one section to `AGENTS.md`: the four roles (maintainer, implementer, reviewer, interactive thread), the issue → pull request → checklist → merge loop, the guardrails, and where th…link
receivedRequire a review before a T3 thread merges No `Closes #N`: this edits the agent contract itself, and filing an issue would queue the same edit for the superagent. ## What changed `AGENTS.md` now states what the delivery…link
resultdropped: PR #112 was already merged by nuuritas at 2026-11-14T00:45:54Z as squash commit fb78abd (pre-merge head d165b62, base 3fd081d; 7 files, +59/−10) before this review round could post anything. Per the review rule…link
resultdropped: PR #113 ("fix: keep note card body and abstract above the card overlay") was already merged by nuuritas before this review ticket began: state MERGED, mergedAt 2026-11-14T00:48:33Z, merge commit a04f4895793cf36…link
decidedAn open, non-draft PR in this repository by another author, fixing a reviewed regression. The review rule applies: one review with file:line evidence, approve or request changes, never merge or push.link
openedReview PR #113: keep note card body above the overlaylink
receivedfix: keep note card body and abstract above the card overlay The card-wide overlay link introduced with the note card redesign (#111) paints above the card's non-positioned children. A markdown note's body links and its…link
receivedBoth points are addressed. **1. Unrelated redesign — removed.** The `src/render.ts` card/reading-page redesign (and its docs and `test/note-card.test.js` changes) came from a second commit that had been stacked on this…link
decidedAn open, non-draft PR in this repository by another author, implementing ref-targeted note updates. The review rule applies: one review with file:line evidence, approve or request changes, never merge or push.link
openedReview PR #112: let agents update a note by its reflink
resultdropped: PR #111 was already handled: nuuritas merged it at 00:31:27 (merge commit 3fd081d) after a parallel nuuritas-agent run approved head 2497f48 at 00:31:16 (review 5900010531). The PR was open when this ticket sta…link
receivedLet agents update a note by its ref ## Summary `POST /api/posts` can now target an existing note by its short ref, so an agent can revise a note it no longer has the `clientId` for. The ref is kept, the stored document…link
decidedAn open, non-draft PR in this repository by another author, implementing a card/reading-page redesign. The review rule applies: one review with file:line evidence, approve or request changes, never merge or push.link
openedReview PR #111: redesign agent note cards and reading pagelink
receivedRedesign agent note cards and the note reading page ## Summary Rework of how an AI-agent note reads in the library and on `/p/:ref`, from the mobile screenshots. - **Card top stays short.** The author line is the agent…link
resultdropped: PR #110 (nuuritas/shelf, "Retire the push log issue and its workflow") is already merged: state MERGED, mergedAt 2026-11-14T00:25:26Z, merge commit unknown from metadata but head 9e85546479fe93a6791d12223e1a1c6…link
decidedAn open, non-draft PR in this repository by another author, retiring a workflow and its docs. The review rule applies: one review with file:line evidence, approve or request changes, never merge or push.link
openedReview PR #110: retire the push log issue and workflowlink
receivedRetire the push log issue and its workflow ## Summary Retire the `XB · push log` issue and the workflow that maintained it. Closes #3 — that is the log issue this change removes, not a work order. No new issue was filed…link
resultdropped: PR #109 (build: deploy with the cf CLI instead of Wrangler) was already handled before this review ticket could act. Checked state via gh: state MERGED, merged by nuuritas at 2026-11-13T23:05:30Z (merge commit…link
resultprogress: Ticket PR opened: https://github.com/nuuritas/wasabi/pull/57 (branch agent/fix-pr41-review-fc24b80d655e). It fixes the one user-facing old name the PR #41 review leaves in the Analysis Live History copy (`ws-l…link
resultready: Done: reviewed merged PR #39's diff as an account other than its author, found two deploy defects, fixed them in follow-up PR #56 (merged as 3355af8), and approved #39; issue #49 is closed. Findings and fix: 1. d…link
decidedAn open pull request in this repository that the agent account did not author: review PR #55 against its docs-only scope and the guardrails, post one line per criterion, approve or request changes, and never merge.link
openedReview PR #55 (docs: make default-branch health an agent responsibility)link
receiveddocs: make default-branch health an agent responsibility Adds a **Default-branch health** section: check CI after merge, treat conflicts as defects, turn a failing or drifting default branch into an issue, and report it…link
resultready: Done: PR #42 now has a non-author approval, and the defect that review found is fixed and merged as c1f411d (#54). Issue #51 closed by the PR. Review of the merged #42 diff (deploy/RENAME_TO_WASABI.md, +15/-2): t…link
resultprogress: Review of merged PR #43 posted as CHANGES_REQUESTED on nuuritas/wasabi (review 5900519863) with four concrete defects. Follow-up PR #53 (docs: reconcile the agent structure section, AGENTS.md, 11+/14-) address…link
openedAddress the unmet review items for PR #24 (docs: rename ws-bot to Wasabi)link
openedAddress the unmet review items for PR #25 (docs: rename product to Wasabi in README and module docs)link
openedAddress the unmet review items for PR #37 (rename: fix the sync test and the stale ws-bot paths)link
openedAddress the unmet review items for PR #38 (rename: use Wasabi package names)link
openedAddress the unmet review items for PR #41 (rename: finish the remaining old-name references)link
openedAddress the unmet review items for PR #39 (deploy: rename the stack and database objects to Wasabi)link
openedAddress the unmet review items for PR #42 (deploy: re-point subscriptions at the renamed publications)link
openedAddress the unmet review items for PR #43 (docs: describe the agent structure)link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
resultready: Audit finished; no repository change was needed, so there is no PR and nothing was merged. Inspected the 21 pull requests updated in the last 24 hours (`gh pr list --state all --search 'updated:>=2026-11-13'`, ru…link
decidedThe issue asks exactly for the audit of pull requests from the last day: list them, judge reviews, open one 'Meet the review on PR #N' issue per failing PR, merge nothing, and report inspected/opened counts.link
opened[auto] audit the last 24 hours of pull requests for missing reviewslink
received[auto] audit the last 24 hours of pull requests for missing reviews ## Goal Every pull request touched in the last 24 hours must be either **approved by an account other than its author**, or have its change requests ad…link
resultdropped: PR #43 (`docs/agent-structure`, "docs: describe the agent structure", +60/-0 in `AGENTS.md`) was already merged before this review ticket could act: merged by `nuuritas` at 2026-11-14T01:08:12Z, merge commit `e…link
decidedAn open pull request in this repository that the agent account did not author: review PR #43 against its stated docs-only scope and the guardrails, post one line per criterion, and approve or request changes; never merg…link
openedReview PR #43 (docs: describe the agent structure) and approve or request changeslink
receiveddocs: describe the agent structure Adds one section to `AGENTS.md`: the four roles (maintainer, implementer, reviewer, interactive thread), the issue → pull request → checklist → merge loop, the guardrails, and where th…link
resultready: PR #20 re-reviewed and APPROVED at head c79e9c2 (https://github.com/nuuritas/wasabi/pull/20). The author pushed four fix commits plus a master merge and addressed every blocking finding from my changes-requested…link
receivedCI passed 0/0 on PR #20 at c79e9c2 Read github/pulls/20/checks for every check.link
resultdropped: CI notification for PR #40, not a human request. `gh pr checks 40` reports "no checks reported on the 'rename/phase4-remove-compat' branch", so 0/0 is not a pass/fail result and there is nothing to fix. The PR…link
receivedCI passed 0/0 on PR #40 at 47eeb62 Read github/pulls/40/checks for every check.link
resultready: Phase 4 on #40: no new PR was needed. I pushed commit 47eeb62 ("rename: finish the Phase 4 stale references", 9 files, +41/−41) to `rename/phase4-remove-compat`, updated PR #40's body with the reconciled acceptan…link
received@nuuritas-agent Phase 3 is done: the maintenance window ran on 2026-11-13, both hosts and both mirror directions are on the Wasabi names, and both `.env` files carry only `WASABI_*`. Continue Phase 4 on #40 autonomously…link
decidedPR #42 is already merged (state MERGED, 1 file, +15/−2, base master). The review rule covers only open pull requests this agent did not author and asks for no acknowledgement or review once a PR is merged or closed, so…link
receivedMaintenance window finished on 2026-11-13. Both hosts run the Wasabi names and the mirror streams in both directions again. **What changed on the machines** - VPS: database and role `wsbot` → `wasabi`; checkout moved to…link
receiveddeploy: re-point subscriptions at the renamed publications The rename runbook renamed publications but never updated `pg_subscription.subpublications`. Renaming a publication does not touch its subscribers: the apply wo…link
openedReview PR #20 against the issue's acceptance criteria and approve or request changeslink
openedReview PR #40 against the issue's acceptance criteria and approve or request changeslink
received@nuuritas-agent review this pull request against the issue's acceptance criteria: one line per criterion with file:line evidence, then approve or request changes. Do not merge it — it is mine.link
received@nuuritas-agent review this pull request against the issue's acceptance criteria: one line per criterion with file:line evidence, then approve or request changes. Do not merge it — it is mine.link
receivedRepository-side rename is finished and merged; `master` is at `e7b97a00`. Merged today: #37 (stale paths and the sync test), #38 (package names), #41 (the last old-name paths, SQL examples, and rebuilt served bundles),…link
receivedrename: finish the remaining old-name references The last repository-side references to the old checkout, role and database, found with `git grep -i -E 'ws-?bot|wsbot'` after #37/#38 merged. - `backend/live/prune.py`: t…link
receivedrename: drop the wsbot compatibility layer (Phase 4) Phase 4 of #23, stacked on #39. **Draft on purpose: this must not merge until the Phase 3 rename window has run and one release has passed**, because it stops reading…link
receiveddeploy: rename the stack and database objects to Wasabi Phase 3 of #23, repo side. **Draft until the maintenance window**: merging is safe, running `deploy/recreate.sh` before the database rename is not. - Compose proje…link
receivedrename: use Wasabi package names Phase 2 of #23, stacked on #37. - Frontend workspace `ws-bot-frontend` → `wasabi-frontend`. - Shared UI package `@ws-bot/ui` → `@wasabi/ui`, including every import, `tsconfig.json` path,…link
receivedrename: fix the sync test and the stale ws-bot paths Part of #23 (Phase 1/2 cleanup). - The `WASABI_POSITION_SYNC_SECONDS` change in #27 made `_env_value(name, legacy)` take a second argument, but `test_the_in_process_s…link
receivedContinue with phase 3 autonomously, no questions. Do every repository-side change in scoped PRs and merge them. For anything that only the operator can do (GitHub repository rename, VPS paths, the gated database migrati…link
receivedDecision: proceed autonomously, no questions. Continue the rename as consecutive scoped pull requests on this issue (each under 200 lines, one module), merging each yourself. The policy no longer permits waiting for an…link
decidedAlready delivered to ticket cc7fdc6ea68864d0853365e6b8080495 as a follow_up on this same thread; that ticket is subscribed to issue #23 and its worker decides where the Phase 1 report leads. Forwarding it again would du…link
receivedPhase 1 merged in #24 (squash commit `8c76d0df`). - `README.md`, `AGENTS.md`, the research harness, gannlevels, and Wasabi Live docs now use Wasabi. - The local `wsbot-*` skills under `.agents/skills` and `.hermes/skill…link
receiveddocs: rename ws-bot to Wasabi Phase 1 of #23. ## What changed - README title and intro now use Wasabi, with a note that machine identifiers still use `wsbot` until the rename completes. - Research harness, gannlevels, a…link
receivedPhase 0 confirmed on 2026-11-13: - Keep `wsdb.nuritas.tr` and `wslive.nuritas.tr`. - Rename database `wsbot` to `wasabi` and role `wsbot` to `wasabi` in the Phase 3 maintenance window. - Keep the volume name `wsbot_db_d…link
decidedAn issue opened by an allowed account that no other rule covers. Names, targets and phase order are already decided by the issue, so nothing is left to design; the change spans code, docs, deployment, database and GitHu…link
openedRename ws-bot to Wasabi across code, docs, deployment, and GitHublink
receivedRename ws-bot to Wasabi across code, docs, deployment, and GitHub # Rename ws-bot to Wasabi ## Decision Use **Wasabi** as the product name and `wasabi` as the machine name. `ws-bot`, `wsbot`, and `WSBOT_` become legacy…link
receivedstudio: v0.16 marker and rustfmt for the resume wake handler Follow-up to #18/#19: marks the fixed build as v0.16 and runs rustfmt on the merged `on_press_tx` wake block so `cargo fmt --check` is clean again. - `5b47562…link
receivedSuperseded: the same root cause and fix landed as #19 on master. Closed to avoid a duplicate.link
receivedstudio: resume a paused replay immediately Closes #18 ## Root cause The transport button used a plain `on_press` handler. Rune runs a frame's `poll` **before** that frame's queued input handlers, so on the click frame `…link
receivedresearch(manager): execution checklist, per-second audit, v120 baseline ## What The manager-first research loop, made auditable: - `designs/manager-execution-checklist.md` — the contract: reaction entry, R <= 8, cut wit…link
resultprogress: Opened PR #19 (https://github.com/nuuritas/ws-bot/pull/19) on agent/studio-resume-stall-8e9dff279a2c against master for issue #18. Root cause read from Rune's frame loop: poll runs before handlers, so the fram…link
decidedConcrete reported bug with a stated correct behaviour and named suspects inside the Studio playback loop; no product or design decision remains and no schema, dependency or generated-code change is implied.link
openedstudio: pause then resume stalls for seconds before the replay continueslink
receivedstudio: pause then resume stalls for seconds before the replay continues ## Symptom Sometimes after pressing pause and then resume, the replay sits for 4–5 seconds before it continues. Nothing changes on the chart while…link
receivedstudio: forming candle from replay seconds, inert replay click, no duplicate ladder list Closes #16 ## Three changes 1. **The forming candle is built from the replay seconds.** The bar that contains the playhead no long…link
decidedThe request is concrete and its target settled, but the operator has already claimed the work in this thread for the operator-directed session and asked explicitly that no second implementation start, so accepting would…link
receivedClaimed by the operator-directed session: the change is being built on branch `agent/16-live-candle` and will arrive as one pull request. Please do not start a second implementation on this issue.link
receivedstudio: the forming 1m/5m candle must update from the replay seconds ## Problem During a replay the chart only appends candles: the bar containing the playhead is drawn from the finished 1m/5m candle, so at 12:00:30 it…link
resultdropped: Issue #9 was already fixed and closed by the operator before this ticket's work could land. While I was implementing the same transport change, a human-authored PR #10 ("Keep replay transport off the chart and…link
receivedSuperseded: issue #11 was delivered by #12 (nuuritas-agent) and is already on master; this parallel branch duplicates it. Kept for reference.link
receivedstudio: label each trade band with its position id Closes #11 ## What Each day trade is already a coloured band; the colour was the only clue which trade it was. The chart now prints the trade id in the empty strip abov…link
receivedstudio: persist the computed day in PostgreSQL Closes #8 ## What The Studio service recomputed a day's trades + ladder after every restart. This adds a read-through PostgreSQL cache, so a cold service start is a databas…link
resultprogress: Draft PR #12 is open for review: https://github.com/nuuritas/ws-bot/pull/12. The change adds trade-id labels above the Studio chart's trade bands (chart.rs field/build/thinning, lib.rs text elements, README).…link
decidedSmall self-contained Studio chart addition with a settled target: draw each day trade's id above its band in the top padding, in the band's colour, thinning overlapping labels at ~36 px, with no new interaction.link
openedstudio: label each trade band with its position id on the chartlink
receivedstudio: label each trade band with its position id on the chart ## Request The chart already draws each day trade as a coloured band, but the colour is the only clue. Put the trade id on the chart, in the empty top marg…link
receivedstudio: replay actions never move the chart; add 1m/5m rewind Closes #9 ## What changed - **No replay action moves the chart.** Start, pause, resume, stop, seeking and the playback itself no longer call `focus_chart_on`…link
resultdropped: No change is needed: issue #6 is already closed and its three requests are fully implemented on master. The ticket branch is clean at HEAD 121fe03f11673894e5649a4cc592b804a2ddf23f, identical to origin/master; t…link
decidedConcrete bug with a determined correct behaviour: transport actions currently reset the view and re-request data; the issue names the offending calls and the expected result, inside the Studio module, with no design cho…link
openedstudio: transport clicks must not move the chart or reload anythinglink
receivedstudio: transport clicks must not move the chart or reload anything ## Request Pressing play, pause, resume or stop must not move the chart and must not reload data. ## Rules - No transport action may issue a request. T…link
decidedThe design is settled but it requires a new PostgreSQL table (schema change) and writes from the Studio service, which Scoped fix and Scoped change both exclude; the repository rule stops agent work on schema changes. N…link
decidedConcrete, self-contained Studio sidebar cleanup with named targets: drop the duplicated candle section and the per-second compute chip, and leave the bottom-left transport as the only replay start. No product or design…link
openedstudio: sidebar must not repeat the candle or offer a per-second computelink
receivedstudio: persist the computed day (trades + ladder) in PostgreSQL ## Request The Studio service recomputes a day's trades and ladder after every restart, even though the same PostgreSQL is already there. Persist the comp…link
receivedstudio: sidebar no longer repeats the candle or offers a per-second compute Closes #6 ## What changed - Removed the **CANDLE AT THIS SECOND** section from `starting_side` and `pending_side`; the clicked candle's OHLC st…link
receivedstudio: sidebar must not repeat the candle or offer a per-second compute ## Operator request 1. Remove the **CANDLE AT THIS SECOND** section from the right sidebar (the chart tooltip already carries the OHLC). 2. Remove…link
resultready: Issue #116 complete. PR #94 (fix(web): default the browser build to the production API) received an independent APPROVED review from @nuuritas-agent (https://github.com/nuuritas/borsaterminal/pull/94#pullrequestr…link
resultready: Issue #115 is resolved and closed. Two deliverables: (1) the independent review of merged PR #93 was performed and recorded as an APPROVED review by @nuuritas-agent (account other than author @nuuritas) — https:/…link
decidedPR #135 was merged by its author at 01:49:34 before review; the review rule says a merged PR gets no acknowledgement and no review, so there is nothing to do.link
receiveddocs: make default-branch health an agent responsibility Adds a **Default-branch health** section: check CI after merge, treat conflicts as defects, turn a failing or drifting default branch into an issue, and report it…link
resultready: Issue #113 is resolved. Independent review posted on merged PR #91 as @nuuritas-agent with state APPROVED (https://github.com/nuuritas/borsaterminal/pull/91#pullrequestreview-5900566446), and follow-up PR #134 me…link
resultprogress: Independent review of PR #92 posted as APPROVED (review 5900536482) after reading the merged diff, call sites and docs. The review found one operator-facing gap: .env.example overrides the new CORS defaults wi…link
openedAddress the review items on PR #111 (issue #132)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #110 (issue #131)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #109 (issue #130)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #108 (issue #129)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #107 (issue #128)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #106 (issue #127)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #104 (issue #125)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #105 (issue #126)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #103 (issue #124)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #102 (issue #123)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #101 (issue #122)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #100 (issue #121)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #98 (issue #120)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #97 (issue #119)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #96 (issue #118)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #95 (issue #117)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #94 (issue #116)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #93 (issue #115)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #92 (issue #114)link
openedAddress the review items on PR #91 (issue #113)link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
resultready: Audit complete. Window 2026-11-13T01:19Z–2026-11-14T01:19Z: 20 PRs updated (#91–#98, #100–#111; #99 is an issue, not a PR). Every one has zero reviews (checked with gh pr list --search 'updated:>=…' and per-PR gh…link
decidedIssue asking to audit the last day of pull requests with concrete steps and acceptance; matches the audit rule exactly.link
openedAudit the last 24 hours of pull requests for missing reviewslink
received[auto] audit the last 24 hours of pull requests for missing reviews ## Goal Every pull request touched in the last 24 hours must be either **approved by an account other than its author**, or have its change requests ad…link
decidedPR #111 was merged by its author at 01:08:18 before review; the review rule says a merged PR gets no acknowledgement and no review, so there is nothing to do.link
receiveddocs: describe the agent structure Adds one section to `agents.md`: the four roles (maintainer, implementer, reviewer, interactive thread), the issue → pull request → checklist → merge loop, the guardrails, and where th…link
resultdropped: The resumed message on github:109 is nuuritas's closure notice for PR #109 ("Closing as a duplicate: the same docs(agents): cap pull request size change landed on master in #108 (merge 34f91d7). Nothing unique…link
decidedPR #110 was merged by its author at 20:44:01 before review; the review rule says a merged PR gets no acknowledgement and no review, so there is nothing to do.link
receivedClosing as a duplicate: the same `docs(agents): cap pull request size` change landed on `master` in #108 (merge `34f91d7`). Nothing unique left in this branch.link
receiveddocs(agents): point Rune work at lib.rs, not the binary Records the module split that now owns the app: `lib.rs` has the modules, `SCENES` and the tests, while `main.rs` is only the native entry point. Add scenes and te…link
decidedOpen pull request by another account, not authored by the agent; the review rule requires reading the diff and posting exactly one review without merging.link
openedReview PR #109: docs(agents) cap pull request sizelink
decidedPR #108 was merged by its author before review (mergedAt 20:41:20); the review rule says a merged PR gets no acknowledgement and no review, so there is no work to route here.link
receiveddocs(agents): cap pull request size ## What Adds a PR-size rule to `agents.md` so the next session does not repeat PR #107. ## The rule - Hard ceiling: **~400 changed lines and ~10 files**; split before opening, not aft…link
receiveddocs: close out the Rune parity plan and cap PR size Two doc-only follow-ups left on the local master line after #107 merged: - `docs(rune): close out the parity plan` — records the P6/P8 outcomes, the final `cargo test…link
resultdropped: PR #107 (feat(mercek): screen-context lens across backend, celld, web and Rune) was already merged before review: state=MERGED, mergedAt 2026-11-13T20:40:04Z by human nuuritas, merge commit b8d6a64d784693c3ffbc…link
decidedOpen PR #107 by another account in this repository, not authored by the agent; the enabled review rule requires reading the diff and posting exactly one review, with no merge.link
openedReview PR #107: Mercek screen-context lens across backend, celld, web and Runelink
receivedfeat(mercek): screen-context lens across backend, celld, web and Rune ## What this is Mercek gets a **lens**: right-click a chart and the next turn carries the structure the app is already drawing — symbol, interval, vi…link
resultdropped: The resumed message on #99 is a verification report, not a request: nuuritas confirms the already-merged C26 interaction works live at bt.nuritas.tr (wheel zoom/drag change the candle crop, Sığdır restores it,…link
receivedLive and verified at bt.nuritas.tr: C26 wheel zoom/drag change the candle crop, Sığdır restores it; no hover/tooltip. Native Shape only.link
receivedfix(rune): center the search field and remove resize chrome Search now sits in the free middle of the topbar instead of being pushed left by the growing title column. The bottom-right resize hit area has no hover fill/r…link
receivedfix(rune): hide empty grid at rest, drop the resize glyph, smooth the ticker Empty workspace cells now paint only during a move/resize gesture; the resting grid is just the background. The always-visible bottom-right ◢…link
openedMake C26 candle chart interactive in consecutive scoped pull requestslink
receivedReopened. Proceed autonomously, no questions: split the C26 chart work into consecutive scoped pull requests (wheel zoom/pan/reset in `symbol_card.rs` first, then `chart.rs` if still needed), merge each yourself, and na…link
receivedfeat(rune): make the C26 candle chart interactive Closes #99. ## What changed C26 drew `canvas(chart(&s.bars))` — a fixed picture of every loaded bar. It now uses a windowed native-Shape renderer driven by Rune's existi…link
receivedfeat(web): branded boot animation Replaces the empty boot screen with a centered Rune mark, subtle pulse ring, staggered market bars and 'Piyasa verisi yükleniyor' hint. CSS-only, respects prefers-reduced-motion, fades…link
resultblocked: Assessed issue #99: C26 interactive candle chart (wheel zoom clamped ~20 bars to full series, drag pan, "Sığdır" fit, reset/clamp on symbol/resolution/fewer-bars change), native Rune `Shape` only. Read `rune_ap…link
receivedfix(web): remove the Loading… boot text Use a custom index.html with an empty status region, branded title/description and a dark boot background. Adds rune_app/scripts/build_web.sh so the shell is installed after every…link
receivedfix(rune): quiet the empty workspace cells React shows empty grid cells as a barely-there outline and only reveals add hints in grid-edit mode. Remove the question-mark box glyph and soften the resting cells to alpha 0.…link
decidedIssue by an allowed account that no other rule covers as scoped work: the author names two modules, so fix/change do not match, but the answer rule requires a ticket and one concrete reply.link
openedfix(rune): make the C26 candle chart interactivelink
receivedfix(rune): remove the egui-charts/wgpu footer label Removes the tiny default footer text from the C05 and Sektör chart cards. The static-preview warnings and loading text remain.link
receivedfix(rune): make the C26 candle chart interactive ## Problem C26 Sembol Kartı still renders its candle chart through `canvas(crate::chart::chart(&s.bars, t))` (`rune_app/src/widgets/symbol_card.rs`). It draws a fixed pic…link
resultdropped: No action needed: issue #90 was closed by the operator at 16:17:50 with the completion announcement. The remaining items I flagged were completed on master by the operator: PR #97 "persist guest preferences in…link
receivedShipped: https://bt.nuritas.tr runs the Rune WASM/WebGPU app with live data (630 symbols, 40 indices), cans, logos, cross-site account auth/chat, Mercek SSE, A2UI, localStorage persistence and C05 history paging. Verifi…link
receivedfeat(web): persist Mercek conversations on the account ## Summary The Rune web build now persists Mercek conversations on the signed-in account instead of always using guest `localStorage`. - `rune_app/src/chat/worker_w…link
receivedfeat(web): persist guest preferences in the browser ## What Native keeps its files; the browser target now persists guest state in `localStorage` instead of silently failing on `std::fs`. - **New `rune_app/src/web_stora…link
receivedLive web is now functional: production API default fixed (#94), 630 symbols + 40 indices, Takas/AKD/Bilanço/Sektör/Bileşenler render live data, THYAO logo shows, cross-site login/me works. Remaining: localStorage layout…link
receivedfix(web): default the browser build to the production API The wasm build had no process env, so it defaulted to 127.0.0.1:8003. Default the browser target to https://api.borsaterminal.com; native still honors BORSATERMI…link
resultprogress: Review verdict recorded on PR #15: REQUEST_CHANGES (review 5900631880), two blocking findings — (1) the VPS fallback never reclaims a transcript task whose lease expired, so a task the Mac abandoned (or a cras…link
receivedCI passed 4/4 on PR #91 at 9391fb5 Read github/pulls/91/checks for every check.link
resultready: PR #13's merged diff was reviewed and the verdict recorded on it (https://github.com/nuuritas/shelf-cloud/pull/13#issuecomment-6869715879): changes needed in one place; the billing removal, the 400 invalid_url fi…link
receivedRebased onto `main` at `8b2ad5d` and pushed `9391fb5`. **The requested fix:** the rebase keeps both fields — `topbar()` and `libraryPage()` take `csrf: string` and `inApp?: boolean`, the `/` route passes `csrf: formToke…link
decidedPR #104 by nuuritas, not authored by the agent; the review rule applies and the ticket reviews it without merging.link
openedReview PR #104: default-branch health docslink
receiveddocs: make default-branch health an agent responsibility Adds a **Default-branch health** section: check CI after merge, treat conflicts as defects, turn a failing or drifting default branch into an issue, and report it…link
resultready: No repository-side change is needed: both code review items in issue #98 were already fixed and merged by PR #58 before the work order arrived, and PR #58's final head was approved. Criterion 1 (close path leaves…link
resultprogress: Opened PR #103 (https://github.com/nuuritas/shelf-cloud/pull/103) on agent/fix-review-100-7b53724f3f9c, fixing the issue #100 review items: policy wording for expired sessions, the RLS/worker tenancy model, th…link
resultready: Issue #99 is fully resolved and closed. User-visible outcome: the two stale Android build-doc lines now name `Shelf.apk`, and the merged PR #40 no longer sits at `CHANGES_REQUESTED` — @nuuritas-agent's follow-up…link
openedFix review items from issue #70 (PR #68)link
openedFix review items from issue #71 (PR #67)link
openedFix review items from issue #72 (PR #66)link
openedFix review items from issue #73 (PR #65)link
openedFix review items from issue #74 (PR #64)link
openedFix review items from issue #75 (PR #63)link
openedFix review items from issue #76 (PR #61)link
openedFix review items from issue #77 (PR #60)link
openedFix review items from issue #78 (PR #59)link
openedFix review items from issue #79 (PR #55)link
openedFix review items from issue #80 (PR #53)link
openedFix review items from issue #81 (PR #52)link
openedFix review items from issue #83 (PR #50)link
openedFix review items from issue #82 (PR #51)link
openedFix review items from issue #84 (PR #49)link
openedFix review items from issue #85 (PR #48)link
openedFix review items from issue #86 (PR #47)link
openedFix review items from issue #87 (PR #45)link
openedFix review items from issue #88 (PR #43)link
openedFix review items from issue #89 (PR #38)link
openedFix review items from issue #90 (PR #36)link
openedFix review items from issue #92 (PR #23)link
openedFix review items from issue #93 (PR #22)link
openedFix review items from issue #94 (PR #20)link
openedFix review items from issue #95 (PR #18)link
openedFix review items from issue #96 (PR #15)link
openedFix review items from issue #97 (PR #13)link
openedFix review items from issue #98 (PR #58)link
openedFix review items from issue #99 (PR #40)link
openedFix review items from issue #100 (PR #25)link
resultready: Reviewed PR #91 (feat(app): native Google sign-in and an app-first library) against the diff, call sites and main. Posted exactly one checklist review on the PR, requested changes. Outcome: all eight content crit…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
received@nuuritas-agent this is your work order. Address the unmet review items listed above, open one pull request, post the checklist before merging, and merge only when every item is met. If it does not fit one module, reply…link
resultwaiting: CI passed on the already-approved head `153b066`; no further action or new review.link
receivedCI passed 1/1 on PR #58 at 153b066 Read github/pulls/58/checks for every check.link
resultdropped: PR #101 (nuuritas/shelf-cloud, "Send the conversation header managed AI gateways ask for") was already merged by nuuritas at 2026-11-14T01:25:42Z, merge commit 43413d78b29cee116ec044cb1232da38648375da, before a…link
resultready: Audit complete: 57 pull requests inspected, 30 review-gap issues opened. Scope: the trigger line at https://github.com/nuuritas/shelf-cloud/issues/69, snapshot 2026-11-14T01:17Z (24h cutoff 2026-11-13T01:17Z), al…link
decidedPR #101 by nuuritas, not authored by the agent; the review rule applies and the ticket reviews it without merging.link
openedReview PR #101: managed AI session headerlink
decidedPR #91 by nuuritas, not authored by the agent; the review rule applies and the ticket reviews it without merging.link
openedReview PR #91: native Google sign-in and app-first librarylink
receivedSend the conversation header managed AI gateways ask for Cloud Pro summaries call `$MANAGED_AI_BASE_URL/chat/completions`. That works with OpenAI, OpenRouter and anything else OpenAI-compatible, but some gateways route…link
receivedfeat(app): native Google sign-in and an app-first library ## What changed **Native Google on Android.** Credential Manager shows the Play Services account sheet, returns an ID token, and the app posts it to `POST /api/a…link
receivedRe-review items addressed at `153b066`, rebased on `main` at `aaabb42`. Full suite with a migrated Postgres and a live server: **137 pass, 1 skip, 0 fail**; `tsc --noEmit` clean. **3. The close path left the bookmark pe…link
decidedAn issue asking to audit the last day of pull requests, which the audit rule covers; the ticket runs the audit, opens one tracking issue per review gap and merges nothing.link
openedAudit the last 24 hours of pull requestslink
resultfailed: LlmError: 429: {"type":"GoUsageLimitError","message":"OpenCode Go usage limit reached (weekly, resets in 1d 22h). To keep going now, turn on Extra Usage or upgrade to Go Plus at https://opencode.ai/console/wrk_0…link
received[auto] audit the last 24 hours of pull requests for missing reviews ## Goal Every pull request touched in the last 24 hours must be either **approved by an account other than its author**, or have its change requests ad…link
decidedPR #68 by nuuritas, not authored by the agent; the review rule applies and the ticket reviews it without merging.link
openedReview PR #68: describe the agent structurelink